Talk:Rangers
From LSWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 16:01, 31 March 2009 (edit) Bladestorm (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (19:59, 1 April 2009) (edit) Alton (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Spider familiars and giant spider familiars were just added as of Change 4285, due to popular request. Are there any other non-sentient animals that anyone wants to be bondable? Dragons and wyverns have already gotten a vehement and resounding "NO! Damnit, just NO!" And remember, the more thought that you put into your request, as well as a logical explanation, the better your chances of seeing it come to fruition.--[[User:Bladestorm|Bladestorm]] 17:01, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | Spider familiars and giant spider familiars were just added as of Change 4285, due to popular request. Are there any other non-sentient animals that anyone wants to be bondable? Dragons and wyverns have already gotten a vehement and resounding "NO! Damnit, just NO!" And remember, the more thought that you put into your request, as well as a logical explanation, the better your chances of seeing it come to fruition.--[[User:Bladestorm|Bladestorm]] 17:01, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I've always thought frog/toad familiars to go with a Slaan shaman character would be fun to roleplay. |
Current revision
Spider familiars and giant spider familiars were just added as of Change 4285, due to popular request. Are there any other non-sentient animals that anyone wants to be bondable? Dragons and wyverns have already gotten a vehement and resounding "NO! Damnit, just NO!" And remember, the more thought that you put into your request, as well as a logical explanation, the better your chances of seeing it come to fruition.--Bladestorm 17:01, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
I've always thought frog/toad familiars to go with a Slaan shaman character would be fun to roleplay.