Talk:Create ioun stone

From LSWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 09:41, 10 April 2008 (edit)
Chaos (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 15:46, 10 April 2008 (edit)
Ryal (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 2: Line 2:
To expand slightly, what causes the most having to go back and painfully rearrange things later is when guilds or whatever with a particular view on the topic don't bother anticipating that the topic may have meaning outside of their context. Possibly the most egregious example of this so far has been the topic Blood being an Ordo Malefici help file. Invisibility being a Ranger help file is a significant percentage as bad, though. —[[User:Chaos|Chaos]] 09:41, 10 April 2008 (EDT) To expand slightly, what causes the most having to go back and painfully rearrange things later is when guilds or whatever with a particular view on the topic don't bother anticipating that the topic may have meaning outside of their context. Possibly the most egregious example of this so far has been the topic Blood being an Ordo Malefici help file. Invisibility being a Ranger help file is a significant percentage as bad, though. —[[User:Chaos|Chaos]] 09:41, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +Makes sense. I was basically filling in the gaps--and noticed 5 of the existing ranger familiar abilities were flagged with their own category -- and 3 were combined with traits...and the rest weren't. I wasn't sure where to go with this really, but it wouldn't be so bad to make these all (Ranger Abilities) and pull out the familiar-granted descriptions from traits.
 +--[[User:Ryal|Ryal]] 15:46, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:46, 10 April 2008

Suggest that these should maybe be e.g. Create ioun stone (Ranger ability). —Chaos 09:39, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

To expand slightly, what causes the most having to go back and painfully rearrange things later is when guilds or whatever with a particular view on the topic don't bother anticipating that the topic may have meaning outside of their context. Possibly the most egregious example of this so far has been the topic Blood being an Ordo Malefici help file. Invisibility being a Ranger help file is a significant percentage as bad, though. —Chaos 09:41, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

Makes sense. I was basically filling in the gaps--and noticed 5 of the existing ranger familiar abilities were flagged with their own category -- and 3 were combined with traits...and the rest weren't. I wasn't sure where to go with this really, but it wouldn't be so bad to make these all (Ranger Abilities) and pull out the familiar-granted descriptions from traits. --Ryal 15:46, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

Personal tools